Antivirus performance comparison
All computer users should install a third party anti-virus tool. These tools aid in identifying and remove malware from a PC. They can also stop malicious websites that could attempt to steal or corrupt the user’s data. However they can drastically slow down a computer’s performance when they are running an examination or updating their database with infected files. This article will examine how different antivirus software performs in tests that are designed to determine the extent to which they slow down the speed and performance of a computer when compared to other similar programs.
The independent AV Comparatives lab runs a large number of separate tests to test security software products. The tests focus on protection in real-world situations as well as the detection of files infected (classical testing) as well as performance. Each test type is run multiple times over the course of a year and based on these results, AVComparatives awards Gold, Silver and Bronze awards to security solutions.
This test was in response to a real-life customer scenario. Many customers use complex PowerShell scripts to dump data from one file system to another, and these processes can take several hours or even days to complete. These complicated scripts run on high-performance equipment, therefore we wanted to see how the antivirus scanner affected this. We also wanted to know how the avastantivirusreview.com/how-to-maintain-transparency-in-corporate-finance-with-virtual-board-rooms tools utilized resources on each machine.
Avira Prime scored well in the AV-Comparatives tests, which included 100% Mac malware and PUA protection and 100% Windows Malware detection. However, it requires a subscription to get full functionality and its advertisements are often quite irritating.